(3) The Book of Songs was not compiled in the same era. The poems in the Book of Songs were collected slowly and became a collection like this. The oldest is "Zhou Song", the second is "Da Ya", the later is "Xiao Ya", and the latest is "Shang Song", "Lu Song" and "Guofeng". Some of Da Ya and Xiao Ya were written by Qing Dafu at that time, and several of them had the author's main name; Da Ya was collected first, and Xiao Ya was collected later. "Guofeng" is a ballad spread all over the country, collected by the ancients. These ballads were probably very old when they were produced, but they were collected very late. When we study the grammar and content of the Book of Songs, we can say that the period contained in the Book of Songs is about six or seven hundred years. Therefore, we should know that the Book of Songs was not compiled by that person, nor was it written by that person. (4) Interpretation of the Book of Songs. The Book of Songs became a classic in the Han Dynasty. The love affairs of men and women described in the Book of Songs seemed unsightly to the Taoists of that class, so they had to add various additional explanations to these natural and living literature. Therefore, the three schools of Qilu and Han in the Han Dynasty added a lot of attachments to the Book of Songs, which was very mysterious. Ming is a love song for men and women. They deliberately say who they praise and who they satirize. The Book of Songs has become a sacred classic in this era. This kind of thing is probably the same both at home and abroad, like the Old Testament, which also contains many poems and stories of love between men and women, but in the Middle Ages in Europe, many pedantic explanations were added by church scholars to make them not contrary to the theology of the Middle Ages. Later, Mao Shi's interpretation of the Book of Songs overturned the previous ones, and found some historical evidence-things in Zuo Zhuan-to make a new interpretation. Mao Shi's views on the study of the Book of Songs are indeed a little more brilliant than those of the three schools of Qilu and Han,juice filling machine, so Mao Shi gradually overthrew the three schools of poetry and became the dominant authority. What we are reading now is Mao Shi. In the Eastern Han Dynasty, Zheng Kangcheng's views on reading the Book of Songs were better than Mao Gong's. Therefore, in the Tang Dynasty, most people who studied the Book of Songs took Mao Zhuan and Zheng Jian as the foundation. In the Song Dynasty, there were Zheng Qiao and Zhu Xi, who studied the Book of Songs, broke the attachment of Mao Gong, and explained it by themselves. Their attitude is a little different from that of the Tang Dynasty,bottle blowing machine, and it has become a trend of saying the Book of Songs in the Song Dynasty. The lecturers in the Qing Dynasty all worshipped Sinology and opposed Song studies. They had special research on textual research and exegesis, but they did not have any special views. They think that the study of the Song Dynasty is inferior to the study of the Han Dynasty, because the Han Dynasty was one thousand seven hundred and eight hundred years ago, and the Song Dynasty was only seven or eight hundred years ago. Little do we know that the thinking of the Han people is much more pedantic than that of the Song people! But at that time, the people who studied the Book of Songs did produce several people who were more brilliant than those in the Han and Song Dynasties, such as Yao Jiheng, who wrote the General Theory of the Book of Songs, Cui Shu, who wrote the Reading of the Wind and the Primitive Book of Songs, Fang Yurun, who boldly overturned the decadent views of the Han and Song Dynasties and studied the words and contents of the book. In this way, the study of the Book of Songs has been progressing from generation to generation in the past two thousand years. Although the study of the Book of Songs is progressive, it is not thorough, mostly overturning this book and attaching that book, overturning that book and attaching this book. In my opinion, PET blow moulding machine ,liquid bottle filling machine, if we want to thoroughly reform the study of the Book of Songs, I'm afraid it's still up to us! We should take up our new vision, good methods and more materials to study boldly and carefully. I believe that the results of our research are more satisfactory than those of our predecessors. This is the attitude we should adopt and the responsibility we should fulfill. Above, I have talked about the concept of the Book of Songs, and now I want to talk about the specific study of the Book of Songs. There are only two ways to study the Book of Songs: First, exegesis. With careful, precise and scientific methods, to do a new exegetical work, for the "Book of Songs" of the text and grammar are from the new notes. Second, solve the problem. Boldly demolishing two millennia of accumulated and oblique ideas; giving each poem a new interpretation entirely from a sociological, historical, and literary perspective. Therefore, when we study the Book of Songs, we should use careful and scientific methods to study every sentence and word. As for the intention of a poem, we should boldly overthrow the previous opinions and have a new understanding of ourselves. Now let me talk about the method first, and then let me talk about the exegesis. Scholars in the Qing Dynasty paid the most attention to exegesis, such as Dai Zhen, Hu Chengyu, Chen Huan, Ma Ruichen and so on. We should read all their exegesis works on the Book of Songs. Dai Zhen has two disciples of Gaozu, one is Jintan Duan Yucai, the other is Gaoyou Wang Niansun and his son, both of whom have very important works for our reference. For example, Duan's annotation of Shuowen Jiezi, Nian Sun's Dushu Magazine and Guangya Shuzheng, etc., especially Jing Yi Shu Wen and Jing Zhuan Shi Ci, which are cited by him, have deeper insights into the Book of Songs, and their methods are much more thorough. Predecessors did not talk about grammar in the study of the Book of Songs, but they could not get a practical and clear explanation, and the more they talked about it, the more confused the original meaning was. Scholars in the Qing Dynasty knew how to use the method of comparison and induction to study grammar. Such as "the end of the wind and the storm", the previous note is-the end of the wind, the wind also. However, in the Qing Dynasty, Wang Niansun and his son compared "the end of wind and violence" with "the end of warmth and benefit" and "the end and poverty", so we can see that the word "end" should be interpreted as "both". With this method, naturally, no matter what difficulties we encounter, as long as we sum them up and compare them, it will be clear at a glance. The word "Yan", which is commonly used in the Book of Songs, is difficult to understand. Han people interpret the word "I", which is naturally impassable. Wang Niansun and his son knew that the word "Yan" was a word, but they could not tell its grammatical function. I have also used this method of comparison and induction to copy the sentences containing the word "Yan" in the Book of Songs, so that I can know how the word "Yan" is used. Let's try: Tong Gong Xi, accept the words to hide it. Travel by driving words. Zhi Bi Nanshan,CSD filling line, said to pick its fern. In these examples, "Yan" is used between two verbs. Receive and hide "," drive and travel ".. gzxilinear.com